Physical Security in 2026: A Preview of Things to Come1 min read

Author

Michael Cruz

Senior Security Consultant

Date
Share
summary

When we look back at the physical security environment of the mid-2020s, the greatest hurdle was not a lack of technology, but a lack of connection. Campus safety teams were drowning in data, forced to operate within a complex network of security silos.

The video management system (VMS) didn’t inherently talk to the access control system (ACS), and neither spoke fluently to the intrusion alarms. An operator monitoring a busy student union would receive an isolated “door-held” alarm in one software window, then have to manually switch to a second application, identify the correct camera, and scrub the footage just to verify if the incident was a security breach or just a student holding the door for a friend.

This fragmented approach, which is the essence of reactive security, led directly to alert fatigue, slow response times, and missed opportunities to truly understand the dynamics of an incident.

To read the full article as published in Campus Safety Magazine, click here.

More News & Resources

On Cozen O’Connor’s Cyber Law Monitor podcast, host Andrew Baer is joined by Matthew Klahre from Cozen O’Connor’s Technology, Privacy & Data Security practice group for a discussion, with practical tips, on how to manage internal and ...

This seminar, focused on practice management land mines in small and mid-sized law firms and how to circumvent them, will feature three segments. Presentations and speakers will include: Management “Land Mine” #1: Workplace Security  Management ...

Cybercriminals steal billions of dollars from small businesses every year, and one of their favorite methods is the business email compromise (BEC), a sophisticated way to divert funds from legitimate business-to-business transfers. A Common Example ...