Physical Security in 2026: A Preview of Things to Come1 min read

Author

Michael Cruz

Senior Security Consultant

Date
Share
summary

When we look back at the physical security environment of the mid-2020s, the greatest hurdle was not a lack of technology, but a lack of connection. Campus safety teams were drowning in data, forced to operate within a complex network of security silos.

The video management system (VMS) didn’t inherently talk to the access control system (ACS), and neither spoke fluently to the intrusion alarms. An operator monitoring a busy student union would receive an isolated “door-held” alarm in one software window, then have to manually switch to a second application, identify the correct camera, and scrub the footage just to verify if the incident was a security breach or just a student holding the door for a friend.

This fragmented approach, which is the essence of reactive security, led directly to alert fatigue, slow response times, and missed opportunities to truly understand the dynamics of an incident.

To read the full article as published in Campus Safety Magazine, click here.

More News & Resources

While having lunch with a local school superintendent today, I asked him about what projects the district is working on this summer. After going over a few things he hit on some of the security ...

Philadelphia, PA – July 15th, 2026 — COSECURE is proud to announce that Principal Consultant Drew Neckar, CPP, CHPA, CPD, has been recognized as one of the Life Safety Alliance’s Top 40 Global Thought Leaders ...

Modern organizations invest significant capital to fortify their digital perimeters. Advanced firewalls. Network encryption. Zero-trust architectures. We spend millions of dollars to protect our data. Yet, every day, our executives and team members walk through ...