Physical Security in 2026: A Preview of Things to Come1 min read

Author

Michael Cruz

Senior Security Consultant

Date
Share
summary

When we look back at the physical security environment of the mid-2020s, the greatest hurdle was not a lack of technology, but a lack of connection. Campus safety teams were drowning in data, forced to operate within a complex network of security silos.

The video management system (VMS) didn’t inherently talk to the access control system (ACS), and neither spoke fluently to the intrusion alarms. An operator monitoring a busy student union would receive an isolated “door-held” alarm in one software window, then have to manually switch to a second application, identify the correct camera, and scrub the footage just to verify if the incident was a security breach or just a student holding the door for a friend.

This fragmented approach, which is the essence of reactive security, led directly to alert fatigue, slow response times, and missed opportunities to truly understand the dynamics of an incident.

To read the full article as published in Campus Safety Magazine, click here.

More News & Resources

When we look back at the physical security environment of the mid-2020s, the greatest hurdle was not a lack of technology, but a lack of connection. Campus safety teams were drowning in data, forced to ...

Philadelphia— January 12, 2026 — COSECURE, a national consulting practice specializing in holistic physical security, cybersecurity, and emergency preparedness, is proud to announce the appointment of Don Hough as Vice President – Public Sector. Don ...

Safety and security policies and procedures across K–12, higher education, and healthcare campuses continue to evolve in response to emerging risks, new technologies, and shifting regulations. Hearing directly from fellow campus protection professionals about their ...