Physical Security in 2026: A Preview of Things to Come1 min read

Author

Michael Cruz

Senior Security Consultant

Date
Share
summary

When we look back at the physical security environment of the mid-2020s, the greatest hurdle was not a lack of technology, but a lack of connection. Campus safety teams were drowning in data, forced to operate within a complex network of security silos.

The video management system (VMS) didn’t inherently talk to the access control system (ACS), and neither spoke fluently to the intrusion alarms. An operator monitoring a busy student union would receive an isolated “door-held” alarm in one software window, then have to manually switch to a second application, identify the correct camera, and scrub the footage just to verify if the incident was a security breach or just a student holding the door for a friend.

This fragmented approach, which is the essence of reactive security, led directly to alert fatigue, slow response times, and missed opportunities to truly understand the dynamics of an incident.

To read the full article as published in Campus Safety Magazine, click here.

More News & Resources

For much of my career, my work has focused on one question: How do we make schools safer in a way that actually works? Over the years, I’ve had the opportunity to work with thousands ...

While schools may no longer use coded announcements like “Code Red,” “Hard Lockdown,” or “Mr. Brown is in the building” to signal active shooter incidents, it remains essential that they issue clear, plain-language announcements that ...

February 17, 2026 COSECURE Enterprise Risk Solutions, Cozen O’Connor’s dedicated security consulting division, is pleased to announce that Gloria Graham, CHPA, CPP, will join the firm as a Principal Consultant, effective February 17, 2026. In ...