Behavioral Threat Assessment and Management (BTAM): A Critical Gap in its Implementation2 min read

Author

COSECURE

Date
Share
summary

A new ASIS International study reveals significant gaps in how schools conduct Behavioral Threat Assessment and Management (BTAM), with only 15% consistently reviewing students’ online activity—despite 96% of students using social media daily. Many schools still rely on unstructured or incomplete BTAM processes, missing key elements recommended by NTAC such as multidisciplinary review, consistent documentation, and structured decision-making. COSECURE’s experts, including Joseph Hendry, Drew Neckar, and Robert Evans, emphasize that effective threat assessment depends on understanding behavioral patterns across both physical and digital environments.

A recent study published by ASIS International revealed some eye-opening findings about Behavioral Threat Assessment and Management (BTAM) practices in schools.

Only 15% of schools conduct social media or online footprint reviews every time they perform a BTAM assessment. 8% don’t check at all, and the rest only do so “sometimes.”

That number is startling — especially when 96% of students report using social media daily (Pew Research, July 10, 2025). Given how often concerning behaviors originate or evolve online, this gap represents a major blind spot in the assessment process.

Just because a threat may not begin online doesn’t mean the key indicators to determine its credibility aren’t there. The reality is that radicalization, ideation, and grievance development often manifest digitally long before they become visible in person.

According to the U.S. Secret Service National Threat Assessment Center (NTAC), many schools are still designing their own BTAM processes — often without incorporating key recommended elements such as structured decision-making, multidisciplinary review, or consistent documentation. In fact, only 31% of schools are using a highly structured process to ensure that threats are assessed consistently, fairly, and appropriately.

At COSECURE, we see this pattern reflected across the country, where schools are well-intentioned but often under-resourced or under-trained in implementing comprehensive BTAM frameworks.

“Threat assessment isn’t just about reacting to behavior; it’s about understanding context, patterns, and escalation – and that content increasingly lives online.” — Joe Hendry, PSP, CLEE | COSECURE Senior Consultant, Behavioral Threat Management

Our multidisciplinary experts — including Joseph Hendry, PSP, CLEE, Drew Neckar, and Robert Evans – continue to help educational institutions build structured, evidence-based school security and BTAM programs.

If you’re interested in strengthening your school or district’s security posture including the BTAM process, our team can help evaluate your current security framework, align it with NTAC and other school safety best practices, and ensure your programs are equitable, defensible, and effective.

Connect with one of COSECURE’s behavioral threat assessment school safety specialists: info@cosecure.com

More News & Resources

A recent study published by ASIS International revealed some eye-opening findings about Behavioral Threat Assessment and Management (BTAM) practices in schools. Only 15% of schools conduct social media or online footprint reviews every time they ...

November 5, 2025, Philadelphia, PA –– Today, COSECURE, a national risk management and security consulting firm with an emphasis on physical security, emergency preparedness, active threat prevention, and cybersecurity, announced it has become a supporting ...

Many organizations—especially schools and healthcare systems—make security decisions without the benefit of subject-matter expertise. Leadership teams understand the importance of safety, but without independent guidance, they often rely on vendors to define the problem and ...